Some Back-of-the-envelope Calculations

April 30 2024

Page Forthcoming)

Table of Contents

  1. Can we save as many lives as Corrie Ten Boom?

  2. If all churchgoing Americans tithed, could it end global poverty?

  3. Donating for animal welfare vs. adopting a more humane diet?

1. Can we save as many lives as Corrie Ten Boom?

2. If all churchgoing Americans tithed, could it end global poverty?

3. Donating for animal welfare vs. adopting a more humane diet?

A donation to corporate cage-free egg campaigns on average has a greater impact than switching your diet to cage-free. Economists Lusk and Norwood estimate that for every 1 chicken egg an American forgoes consuming, 0.91 fewer chicken egg will be produced in the long term (within 5 years).

Source: Compassion, by the Pound: The Economics of Farm Animal Welfare, by F. Bailey Norwood and Jayson L. Lusk, 2011.

Since the average American consumes around 281 eggs per year (source USDA https://www.usda.gov/oce/commodity/wasde/wasde0124.pdf), switching from less humane caged eggs to more humane cage-free eggs will, on average, affect 255 eggs in the long term. The net effect of this diet switch is therefore estimated to directly affect 1 to 2 chickens per year.

On the other hand, Salius estimates that corporate cage-free egg campaigns affected 9 to 120 chickens per year per dollar spent (source: https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/L5EZjjXKdNgcm253H/corporate-campaigns-affect-9-to-120-years-of-chicken-life).

Therefore, even the most conservative estimates of the effectiveness of corporate cage-free egg campaigns suggest that a moderate donation to a targeted animal welfare advocacy is far more impactful than an individual egg diet changes.